The west especially has only recently come round to having rational considered discusions on immigration and immigration numbers. But the people of the west have to wake up because now the plan is to have them completely replaced. And there are similar plans for the rest of the world as well
As mentioned in a previous article, natural and sustainable immigration happens organically. Economic immigrants, whether legal or not, can’t really be blamed or demonised for looking for a better quality of life.
And genuine asylum seekers who escape war zones and civil wars created by any aggressor including western/Nato countries should expect our sympathy and help, and be given refuge in the nearest safe country or countries as set out in international law. Furthermore, any person from any ethnicity, background or race should of course be free to choose to be with, love and settle with whomever they want in accordance with whatever the citizenship laws of any particular country might be.
But it isn’t that simple. Sadly there are political leaders and planners who seek to create and use mass immigration and the forced movement of people for their own nefarious purposes.
‘Replacement Migration’ is an official published plan to deliberately bring in at least 56 million people from mostly Africa to Europe by 2050. It’s a very real policy that’s already been planned by both the UN and EU since at least the year 2000 – a policy carried out under the auspices of various inter connected globalist agencies and ‘Non Governmental agencies’ such as the International Organisation for Migration, Global Migration Group, The Africa-EU Partnership, World Bank and the cult of international sustainable development also known as Agenda 21/2030 Agenda.
Mass enforced immigration is recognised by the UN itself as an incitement to genocide as defined by the United Nations even though the UN themselves as well as the EU are proponents of the Replacement Migration plan.
And on December 19th 2018 a worldwide agreement called The Global Compact for Migrationwas also signed in Marakesh. It essentially gives equal rights to all migrants from across the world to migrate to anywhere they want, whether they are legal or not. The agreement was put in place by the UN and, for all intents and purposes, outlaws any sctrutinising or questioning of the plan or of the immigrants themselves by those countries who have signed or by media groups or press within those countries. In the finest Orwellian tradition, any public funding for these press and media groups is recommended to be stopped if they stray from the narrative or ask ‘difficult’ questions when it come to immigration.
Luckily, not all countries have signed this grubby globalist plan. 152 countries voted in favour of the resolution to endorse it, while the United States, Hungary, Israel, Czech Republic and Poland voted against it, and 12 countries including Australia, Switzerland, Chile, Brazil, Estonia, Italy, Bulgaria, Dominican republic and Latvia abstained. 24 countries didn’t vote at all and many of the countries who have signed may yet change their minds. A petition of 130,000 signatures to the UK parliament asking for a parliamentary discussion on the matter was ignored even though the parliament is obliged to discuss any petition with over 100,000 signatures.
The carrying out of this agenda has been hovering around for years. Prior to 1999 the net immigration numbers in to the UK state ranged from between 0 to 50,000 per year. From 1999 onwards, following a Labour-led policy under globalist grinning puppet Tony Blair to open the flow of doors to immigrants to Britain, this figure has been closer to 300,000 net a year – an absurd figure equivalent to a new city around the size of Coventry each year. Whatever happens between the UK state and the EU, it’s likely that those in power will continue to try and push for disproportionate mass immigration in to the UK and elsewhere. But all politicans can be voted out which is why non political people have to start standing as representatives instead, and the secretive civil service culture disbanded.
Those who have looked in to these things in depth will know that both the EU and UN were started and supported by internationalist bankers and financiers right from the very start. Robert Schumann, Jean Monnet and the international bankers who started the EU, stated from the beginning that the EU was to be a centralised supranational body. The EU’s first founding president of the highest body of the EU, the EU Commission, was Walter Hallstein – a prominent law professor under the Nazis. How was it possible that such a man could become the “founding father” of the Brussels EU?
In his book the The Invisible Collegeauthor William Stuart states that the documented inspiration to those involved with setting up the EU and plans for a proposed one world government goes way back to Freemasons Albert Pike and Giusseppe Mazzini in the late 19th century, and that the later instigators were also affiliated and working in parallel with the Freemason Count Coudenhove-Kalergi – he of the maniacal Kalergi plan to destroy all the peoples and nations of Europe through mass enforced migration from outside of Europe – sadly not a conspiracy theory but a documented plan as explained in his “Praktischer Idealismus,” (Practical Idealism) book and the Pan European movement of the 1920’s, supported by the financial elite.
Such plans go against all notions of equality and the celebration of diversity of course. Such plans are a deliberate attack on the very notion of diversity – a “Mein Kampf” in reverse. Ethnocidal based European unification and the union of other Orwellian world regions would likely be the first steps in creating an eventual world government, potentially under the UN or a similar unelected global body.
What Kalergi openly called for was not only the destruction of European nation states but also the deliberate ethnocide of the indigenous, mostly Caucasian race of the European continent. Another reason why this is a serious concern stems from the fact that every year, in his honour, the European Union bestows the Coudenove-Kalergi prize to “Europeans who have excelled in promoting European integration.” This is done officially under the name of The Charlemagne Prize. Recent winners of the award have been such moral luminaries as Angela Merkel, Herman Van Rompuy, Tony Blair and Henry Kissinger.
The Replacment Migration for Europe plan seems to simply be a continuation of the Kalergi plan. No race or peoples are safe from this crazed global unification policy. It’s proposed that other continents and races will then follow until there is a one global homogeneous uniform mass of people in serfdom to the self appointed elite, and all the beautiful diversity of nations, peoples and races on earth are destroyed.
This is sadly no joke. Frans Timmermans, First Vice-President of the European Commission and European Commissioner for Better Regulation, Interinstitutional Relations, the Rule of Law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights, would agree it seems.
Whether Kalergi or anyone else’s vision is being followed word for word or not perhaps is not the main issue. Mass and disproportionate movement of people in to Europe is happening whether we believe it or not. And most are economic migrants not refugees.
Once those genuinely fleeing wars arrive at the nearest safe country and are given sanctuary as they should, they can claim refugee status. This is why aid from Britain and Europe is much better spent on helping those in need in these safe haven countries nearest to conflict zones such as Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon. But if those claiming to be refugees then insist on moving on to other countries that they have their eye on then they become self chosen economic migrants.
It was reported that more than a million recorded people reached Europe through irregular means in 2015 when it seemes that a literal invasion was at its most obvious. According to Frans Timmerman once more, (Vice-President of the European Commission), it’s estimated that around 60% of those coming in to Europe from the Middle East and Africa are economic migrants using asylum-seeker status as a cover. Even this 60% figure seems to be a conservative estimate from looking at other various reports.
It’s long puzzled many how so many poverty stricken refugees escaping from war-torn countries can afford to pay the 10,000 or so Euros needed to cross the Mediterranean into Europe. Austrian intelligence officials have revealed that US government agencies are paying for the transport of a great deal of these migrants in to Europe. On August 5th, 2015 Austrian magazine Infodirekt reported:
“It has come to our knowledge that US organisations are paying for the boats taking thousands of refugees to Europe. US organisations have created a co-financing scheme which provides for a considerable portion of the transportation costs. Not every refugee from North Africa has 11,000 Euro cash. Nobody is asking, where is the money coming from?”
French government officials and Turkish authorities are also reported to have been caught red handed selling life boats and equipment to refugees in Turkey.
Billionaire George Soros, alleged funder of numerous revolutionary ‘springs’ and movements including the divisive race baiters Black Lives Matter in the USA – he who also has a global network of non-governmental organisation (NGO) fronts operating under his Open Society Foundations – recently insisted that the European Union should spend a further 10 billion Euros to facilitate the movement of more than a million mainly ‘Muslim refugees’ into Europe every year from now on.
Brussels seems to be complying with the instructions of this self-appointed global Tsar. According to renowned Irish journalist Gearóid Ó Colmáin, the company that would mostly benefit from this increased EU spending is Equistone Partners Europe, an affiliate of the Rothschild-owned Barclays Bank.
Reports also allege that geopolitical meddling have helped to create the sudden mass movements of people in general, allowing for the resulting integration of ISIS/ISIL members in to the mass of economic migrants and asylum seekers arriving in Europe. The end outcome being the potential chaos and clash of civilisations and religions that we have already seen glimpses of.
It’s a claim substantiated by numerous other sources reporting that thousands of covert trained fighters have been successfully smuggled in to Europe posing as migrants – the full amount being impossible to determine at this stage
None of this should really be that much of a surprise considering that it’s by now being widely reported that it was the USA, Israel, the UK and their allies who created Al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood in the first place – something author William Stuart also covers in details in his book ‘The Invisible College: 911 to Armageddon’. And the illegal attacks led by a small crazed Anglo-American-Israeli elite seen in recent years on majority Muslim countries such as Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya has also conveniently led to the radicalisation of many of the men and women of those countries – a large proportion of whom are now intent on revenge through the bloody destruction of the west by war or invasion.
It could be easily surmised that this has played beautifully in to the hands of those globalist elements who themselves want to see Europe destroyed by a clash of civilisations as the Kalergi plan and the Replacement Migration plan also lays out. In other words – the radical Muslims and mass of migrants have been played as much as we Europeans have. Divide and conquer, play both sides and all that. It’s said that all modern wars are banker wars. Perhaps it would be an idea for all divided enemies to start talking to each other and to look at who all the vested interests pulling all these strings might be and ask why are they doing it?
It’s commonly alleged by renowned historians such as Anthony C Sutton, Carroll Quigley, William Stuart and many others that it was also the internationalist banking fraternity based out of Wall street and the City of London who, directly and indirectly,funded the murderous and genocidal Bolshevik revolution in Russia in 1917 as well as the rise of Hitler and the Nazi Germany regime in the 1920’s and 1930’s. Together with the first world war, these led to the deaths of hundreds of millions people.
It’s also public knowledge by now that it was to the globalist banker Lord Rothschild that British government foreign secretary Arthur James Balfour bizarrely ‘promised’ the whole of Palestine in his infamous Balfour declaration letter of November 2nd 1917, not to any nation or peoples.
Natural and sustainable immigration occurs in to all countries and every country on earth has an indisputable right to control immigration numbers in to their countries based on their own capabilities and needs. And all peoples and nations have the right to preserve the characteristics and fundamental features of their civic identity as well as their indigenous and historical ethno – cultural identity, especially so if these things are under obvious, disproportionate and intentional threat.
This is recognised by international anti genocide and anti ethnocide laws and by basic morality, decency and common sense. Examples of these fundamental rights can be seen in Japan, in Israel, in Asiatic countries, in African countries, and in recent laws created for native Americans. But this debate really should be about numbers and proportionality of immigration numbers – it doesn’t have to be about race, ethnicity or nationality.
But immigration only works if the immigration numbers are sustainable, occur organically and are in keeping with the needs and capabilities of the host nation. That and ensuring that there is enough time and resources for new citizens to assimilate and become productive members of their new societies.
When the numbers are disproportionate, unnaturally forced or out of control, there will inevitably be tensions and effects on jobs and wages, on public services and on society at large. Nobody wins.
Racial incitement to hatred and violence from across the whole political spectrum should be tackled whenever it occurs. But the racism of those globalist ‘open border’ political leaders that deliberately inflict disproportionate mass migration on any country without the agreement of that country and its people should be tackled equally.
As importantly, all matters to do with diversity in the form of race, culture, religion and nationality should be rationally discussed, debated and understood rather than brushed under the carpet and treated as if they are things that don’t exist at all.
But in Britain, Europe and the west generally, extreme politically correct indoctrination by the media and the education system has been so effective that many people self identifying as progressive liberals refuse to recognise the issues that mass unfettered and open border immigration can cause to any country if not tackled with a rational and balanced approach. The narrative being created and pushed obsesses on, forces and fetishises the whole issue to be about race and skin colour, polarising and framing all arguments based on this predisposition.
And the snobbery, contempt, and derisiveness shown by the liberal elite towards Britonnic and European citizens of all races and creed who have a rational and legitimate concern about unlimited immigration, also shows how disconnected the political system is from the public and Realpolitik in general. The inverted racism and polarised views of this liberal elite are perfectly demonstrated by the fact that they seem to believe that it’s only the pink/white citizens of Britain and Europe who have concerns about unlimited immigration in to their countries.
And there is another deeply flawed double standard in the argument for enforced unlimited immigration and multiculturalism. A great deal of the world’s non-European populations are mono cultural/mono racial. Why aren’t self proclaimed progressives insisting that these countries should be forced to accept open door immigration, to become more multicultural and more ethnically diverse? Why aren’t they demanding that China, Japan, Israel, Saudi Arabia and African countries become unquestioning multi cultural and multi racial societies? Why is it that, at the present time, it’s only the indigenous European nations that should unequivocally accept enforced unlimited immigration and multiculturalism?
Many will protest to rightly defend Tibet and Palestine from displacement and colonisation because the liberal progressive media has told them that this is acceptable to do. But the same people won’t defend the same rights held by European nations. Here the inconsistency and hypocrisy of enforced immigration and multiculturalism is exposed.
And these same blinkered and brainwashed people fail to comprehend that the caucasian white/pink race is also an ethnic minority in the world – only making up around 11% of the world’s total population; a figure that seems to be decreasing year on year.
And these western so called liberal progressive dupes seem to revel in the promotion of sovereignty in the west as being an inherently racist concept. This is nonsense. Racism is defined as persecution or demeaning of other races based on the idea of racial superiority. The obvious irony is that deliberate unfettered and enforced immigration in to any country in order to colonise, destabilise and destroy it is one of the most extreme racist doctrines that can be carried out and, as mentioned, is recognised as genocide by the UN.
The cruel trick played on the well meaning dupes in the west who support unlimited mass migration and open borders, is that they themselves are the unwitting victims of the worst kind of horrible and vexatious racist doctrine against them.
In a glorious mess of ignorance and zombie like virtue signalling they will even gladly assist and protest on behalf of those elements that want to see them destroyed. That is how effective the cognitive dissonance and propaganda has become and it’s one example of how ultra progressiveness has become ultra regressive.
The immigration debate has been thoroughly polarised by the decaying faux liberal progressiveness. The choice we’re told is to either be on the left and for unbridled open door immigration, or on the right and an ‘anti migrant’, xenophobic, white privileged swivel eyed isolationist supremacist evil patriarchal racist. Or of course anti semitic or, the current faivorate dished out to anyone with a differing view point to the pious Social Justice Warrior; a Nazie. This polarisation circus is no friend of rational debate dealing with facts, logic, reason and truth.
But if the left / right terminology has to be used for the sake of explaining then so be it. To paraphrase a commentator on the Craig Murray blog; whilst economic issues have definitely lurched sharply rightwards in recent years, social issues have moved sharply to the left, by design. This is why there has been such an increase in identity politics – political correctness, third wave feminism, the undermining of the traditional family and the lunacy of the transgender agenda which seeks to deny biological facts and force everyone to agree that 2+2 =5 – all of this to the exclusion of what might be termed ‘old left’ concerns.
And whilst these politically correct issues, also often referred to as cultural Marxism/critical theory, become ever more ubiquitous, issues of rising inequalities, globalisation, transnational corporatism and neo liberal economic thinking as seen in the EU and UN have been largely ignored.
And in this polarised supercharged politically correct climate, when it comes to issues such as mass immigration, there is no room for any middle ground based on rational controlled immigration according to skill, need and capacity – i.e. a normal way for countries to operate. Those expressing these rational views are shouted down by those brainwashed and lost to politically correct and identity politics indoctrination.
Children are also being indoctrinated to become unthinking dutiful global citizens parroting the same well oiled clichés under the globalist deception of sustainable development as seen and heard so commonly.
The indoctrination of political correctness has been so pervasive that it has brainwashed many into dismissing their own countries as parochial annoyances that should be destroyed in favour of a globalist borderless new world order of regions – a horrible hybrid of Orwellianism and a Brave New World.
But how can an indoctrinated global citizen or ‘internationalist’ truly love the world and all its diversity of people if he or she can’t even acknowledge or respect the right of their own country to exist? It tends to be true that it’s people who have love or respect for their own country that are the people who make the best global citizens in its truest sense. Because these individuals can understand and respect true diversity, and know that the differences and idiosyncrasies of the differing nations on earth should be celebrated not treated with scorn and dismissal in favour of enforced globalist uniformity.
As German philosopher Johann Gottfried Herder – an inspiration to the renowned Austrian and honory Welshman writer Leoplold Kohr of ‘small is beautiful’ fame, wrote with some truth:
“The deluged heart of the idle cosmopolite is a hut for no-one.”
It’s also very important to note that the cabal working with and behind the internationalist bankers and financiers who are driving the global mass migration plans have been at it for a very long time indeed. As silly as it sounds to many who haven’t looked objectively and in detail at these things, numerous historians and writers state that this evil conspiracy goes back to the dawn of mankind. In his excellent book ‘Pawns in the Game‘, author William Carr describes how a small group of ‘false priests and money lenders’ have been at it since before Biblical times trying to create a new world order and to gain full control over its inhabitants.
There are many differing opinions on this of course but it seems that, although they may pretend otherwise, they don’t really belong to nor care for any one nation or peoples but it seems they will act as corruptive parasites on any nation, peoples or religion that they deem useful for their goal of full globalist power and control. Carr describes them interchangeably as Illuminati, Pharisees and of the Synagogue of Satan.
Occultism has been there as the instigator of many if not most religions and can be found at the higher levels of most organised religions including Roman Catholicism, Islam, Talmudic Rabbinical Judaism (together with the Zohar/ Kabbalah teachings) , Protestant Christianity, Theosophy, Buddhism, Hinduism, Gaianism and the New Age Movement. It’s also to be found as a guiding principle in the upper echelons of the unelected United Nations.
What unites all of these is that, at their highest levels, they are following occult and Kabbalistic luciferian doctrine. Or to put it another way, the people behind enforced mass migration around the world, and behind many other things that are disrupting and destroying civilisation as we know it, are working to an agenda most normal people couldn’t even comprehend. They are, at the highest echelons at least, what can only really be described as evil and devoid of morality, and are part of a an affiliated globalist cabal that ultimately seek a one world state and full globalist control, with one government, one currency, one army and one world religion, and with a luciferian god masquerading as the true God. In other words, this is a good old fashioned battle between good and evil. And it is a spiritual battle and spiritual warfare.
Which brings us back to why national sovereignty of all nations on earth is so important. Sovereignty, accountability and democracy. Speaking as a Welsh Briton who believes in the fundamental right of countries, including my own country of Wales, to be fully fledged sovereign states in the world, it should be obvious by now that the failed EU and UN projects are about eroding and destroying the sovereignty of nations rather than protecting them. And mass unfettered migration is only one way that they will attempt to do it.
I’m proud of my country of Wales. I’m proud to be from a spirited country that isn’t afraid to fight for its right to exist in a world of diverse, beautifully different nations on earth. And I want it to be free to contribute to civilisation and to humanity in the best way it can.
My patriotism is not based on hate of any other country or people, narrow mindedness or isolationism. It’s based on love of my own country and on the rational concept of the fundamental right of nations to sovereignty on planet earth – a thought crime for the current self appointed liberal elite.
Those that genuinely love and cherish the remarkable cultural richness and diversity of the nations and peoples on earth know that those are the very qualities that the globalist elites want to weaken and eventually destroy if they get their way.
Predictably, our politicians and public figures have failed in their moral duty to expose this horrific conspiracy to destroy all nations. The people of all the nations on earth are realising that they have been cheated by the elites of their countries and have to start holding them to account and shining a light on all their lies.
(This is an adapted version of an article on the Kalergi plan from the cymrusofren site –see here)
Main photo by Llun Borut Podgoršek, MORS (Slovenian defence department under CC BY 3.0 licence