Very good reasons not to take the Covid vaccine or to agree to further authoritarian lockdown lunacy

by Gruffydd Meredith

Time is short, so let’s try to get to the point. Not all vaccines are necessarily bad but the Covid 19 vaccine agenda that’s being pushed on us all with unquestioning mainstream media and state support and coerciveness, is dangerous and authoritarian and has to be resisted and stopped. Here are some reasons why I believe this.

It has by now being widely admitted that The PCR test is not a reliable test to detect SARS-CoV-2. Kary Mullis, the now deceased creator of the PCR testing technology that’s being widely used to test for alleged cases of COVID-19, stated that he did not believe the technology was suitable for detecting a meaningful presence of any virus or is designed to diagnose diseases, adding “It doesn’t tell you that you are sick”

Mullis’ comments are perhaps surprising for anyone who’s been diligently following the authorities during the COVID-19 hysteria.

Discussing the HIV test with regard to the viral-load tests which attempt to use PCR for counting viruses,  writer and researcher John Lauritsen props up Mullis’ points. Cited in a peer reviewed paper Lauritsen states:

Although there is a common misimpression that the viral-load tests (PCR tests) actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves”

So, for example it’s believed that there’s no way to distinguish people who are testing positive because they have ongoing infection or whether they’ve had a previous infection and are no longer infectious. The genetic material taken in the test could be from a common cold or other.

A Portuguese appeals Court has recently also ruled that the PCR tests are not a reliable test for Sars-Cov-2, and therefore any enforced quarantine and lockdowns based on those test results are unlawful. This would therefore naturally apply to any mass vaccine programme as well. Further, the ruling suggested that any forced quarantine applied to healthy people could be a violation of their fundamental right to liberty. Most importantly, the judges ruled that a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection.

In their ruling, judges Margarida Ramos de Almeida and Ana Paramés referred to several scientific studies, with one showing that when running PCR tests, if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”

Another way to explain this is to say that each cycle exponentially increases the amount of viral DNA in the sample which means they are more and more unreliable as the cycles increase. The Portuguese ruling goes on to conclude that, based on the science the judges looked at, any PCR test using over 25 cycles is totally unreliable meaning that 100% of tests could therefore be unreliable. It is believed that most tests run at over 25 cycles and are known to be as high as 45. A NHS England report seen here (page 16) states that tests are indeed run at 45 cycles.

The Pravdaesque and Kafkaesque UK mainstream media have sadly and predictably totally ignored this hugely significant case and keep pumping out their identical and unquestioning pro vaccine and pro lockdown propaganda in a demented frenzy.

The OffGuardian also states that the PCR tests are flawed: “The (PCR test) technology relies on amplifying results many times over. If they are amplified less than about 35 times, they report, no-one will test positive. If they are amplified 60 times, everyone will test positive.”

Even the World Health Organisation has finally admitted that the COVID19 PCR Test has ‘a problem’. The WHO delicately amitted that:

In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus (in the PCR test) is difficult to ascertain.”

And, as seen below, current Prime Minister of the UK state, Boris Johnson, also managed to blunder his way to admitting that 93% of Covid tests are innacurate:


And one of the reasons why there are also now more reported cases (but not necessarily rising deaths figures) is because a great many people have now had the PCR test which, as seen here, has been deemed unreliable as it stands, and therefore of little or no relevant scientific value.

Whatever you think of the corona virus narrative, lockdowns nor masks do not seem to work anyhow. And yet they are still pushed in a frenzy with no rational discussion or debate by the UK mainstream media,

And, looking at ONS figures, excess deaths seem to follows lockdowns not the other way round.

It has also already been covered how the reporting of Covid deaths is hugely problematic, with medical staff incredibly being told by authorities to note deaths as Covid deaths even if they simply suspect it to be the cause of death (see full PDF containing above quote here). And, as tragic as any death obviously is for all those involved, the vast majority if not all Covid attributed deaths have had underlying health causes, strongly suggesting Covid may not have had a significant contributory factor in many if not most of these cases. This in turn would therefore suggest that many of the numbers reported in the mainstream media may well be misguided and misleading.

To sum this up, the not fit for purpose PCR Covid test alone means that all Covid case numbers reported on the mainstream media continuously, are unreliable and untrustworthy. All lockdowns are therefore unfounded, meaningless, draconian, tyrannical, immoral and unlawful, and are a serious threat to health and human liberty.

As are the tyrannical track and trace system and any mass vaccination programme. This all essentially means that healthy people are being tested and imprisoned to declare them unwell whilst actual sick people are being refused treatments.

And all of these measures also inevitably favour the big supermarkets, the globalist corporations and online giants over the small to medium businesses now struggling to survive on our high streets – something many are increasingly and logically suggesting may not be unintentional.

But what about the vaccine itself ?

We have already discussed that this Covid vaccines roll out may well be unnecessary and unlawful. And we can’t know or tell whether they are effective or not (and if needed at all) and why the authorities feel they have the right to coerce their use – especially on the vast majority who aren’t suffering from Covid 19 – that is, unless there is an effective pushback from we the people.

On a very basic level, there simply hasn’t been enough time for the vaccines to be fully tested. It usually takes 5-10 years to fully develop and test a vaccine, where as these specific Covid vaccines have been rushed out in less than 10 months. This is deeply unscientific and goes against the fundamental principle of the scientific cautionary principle.

It can be said that the long term health affects of the vaccine or vaccines are therefore unknown. Even if the vaccine is needed as it’s claimed to be, it may still only be needed for around 2% of the population. And according to UK government’s scientific advisers, the chances of dying from a coronavirus infection are believed to be between 0.5% and 1%, meaning that at least 99% of those 2% or so that may fall ill, as with other influenza or cold illnesses, are likely to survive.

And as elaborated on below, it’s been declared that the immunity of the vaccine hasn’t been tested anyhow.

Governments from New Zealand and Australia to Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea and New Zealand are taking a cautious approach to any vaccine roll out, sensibly taking their time before granting regulatory approvals for vaccines. These are said to be ‘waiting to see how the unprecedented vaccination drives play out elsewhere’ and is in stark contrast to the Western nations that have rushed to inoculate populations in such a worryingly short time. It could be suggested that we are the guinea pigs and others elsewhere in the world are watching on like warlords at the back of an open pitched battle, waiting to see how the wind blows.

Furthermore, the crucial and ethical principle of the informed consent or not of parents to allow their children or the elderly and infirm to take any vaccine, is being ignored and pushed to the sidelines as if it’s of no relevance.

And those speaking out or wishing to discuss the matter because they too care about the health and well-being of humans, are branded as selfish, ignorant or not caring about others even though the total opposite is true.

This madness has to be stopped. The roll out of the new Covid vaccine is simply immoral and wrong.

As also reported in the OffGuardian, as of December 10th, the Pfizer vaccine either hasn’t been tested on, or is not recommended for:

  • People under sixteen years of age.
  • Pregnant women (or women intending to become pregnant in the near future).
  • People with serious co-morbidities.
  • People already taking other medications.
  • People who have allergies.

So the official line already cedes that the vaccine may be harmful to some or all of those people.

On top of this, all the vaccine producers all have legal indemnity in the UK, US and other countries, meaning they can’t be sued if people die or are injured from the new vaccine.

On top of this also, there are some elements about the ingredients that are known and warned about. In this Global Research article, it’s reported how a number of the main vaccine producers use an experimental technology known as ‘gene editing’, specifically mRNA gene-editing, something never before used in vaccines. The experimental process can allegedly splice or edit sections of human DNA within a single genome and allegedly provide specific instructions within a given code – what many might describe as a form of human genetic modification in other words.

As the the Global Research article also points out: “Pfizer, famous for its Viagra and other drugs, has partnered with a small Mainz, Germany company, BioNTech, which has developed the radical mRNA technique used to produce the new corona vaccine. BioNTech signed an agreement with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in September, 2019, just before announcement in Wuhan China of the Novel Coronavirus and just before BioNTech made its stock market debut.”

Pfizer themselves state how the vaccines work “by introducing into the body a messenger RNA (mRNA) sequence that contains the genetic instructions for the vaccinated person’s own cells to produce the vaccine antigens and generate an immune response.”

According to Global Research, another very alarming fact about the new Pfizer-BioNTech gene editing vaccine is that “the gene edited mRNA for human vaccine application has never before been approved.”

Dr. Romeo Quijano, retired professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology at the College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, also notes what he alleges are some of the dangers of the experimental gene editing when applied to human vaccines. Quijano warns of:

the danger that the vaccine might actually “enhance” the pathogenicity of the virus, or make it more aggressive possibly due to antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), as what happened with previous studies on test vaccines in animals. If that should happen in a major human trial the outcome could be disastrous. This serious adverse effect may not even be detected by a clinical trial especially in highly biased clinical trials laden with conflicts of interest involving vaccine companies. Even when a serious adverse event is detected, this is usually swept under the rug.”

Quijano also adds:

among other dangers, the virus-vectored vaccines could undergo recombination with naturally occurring viruses and produce hybrid viruses that could have undesirable properties affecting transmission or virulence. The…possible outcomes of recombination are practically impossible to quantify accurately given existing tools and knowledge. The risks, however, are real, as exemplified by the emergence of mutant types of viruses, enhanced pathogenicity and unexpected serious adverse events (including death) following haphazard mass vaccination campaigns and previous failed attempts to develop chimeric vaccines using genetic engineering technology.”

In another article for the British Medical Journal and as previously mentioned, author Peter Doshi reports on how the vaccine producers themselves admit that the vaccine hasn’t been tested for immunity or transmission. According to Doshi:

The world has bet the farm on vaccines as the solution to the pandemic, but the trials are not focused on answering the questions many might assume they are.”

Speaking of Zaks, the producer of the Pfizer vaccine, he states:

Our trial will not demonstrate prevention of transmission,” Zaks said, “because in order to do that you have to swab people twice a week for very long periods, and that becomes operationally untenable”

…Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus.”


So if this vaccine hasn’t been tested for immunity or transmission what’s the point of the vaccine?

There’s also been much talk of the pernicious “immunity passports”, meaning digital documents showing your vaccination status which will likely make you exempt from lockdown and social distancing rules.

It’s not hard to imagine how, unless stopped, this will likely snowball in to an Orwellian and authoritarian system of control and subjugation as seen with China’s social credit system-or worse. And if allowed to happen by us the people and by the mainly useless mainstream media – and by the, sadly, mainly useless, misguided or clueless present day collection of political representatives-most of whom have thus far utterly failed to speak any truth to power or hold any power to account.

It could never happen in the west many proclaim. But it’s happening right now under our noses.

It’s worth also remembering that, according to the UK Government itself, as of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK.

Do you really trust this person to ‘advise’ you what you should or shouldn’t take?

We should also remember that there’s a massive amount of scientific consensus against lockdowns and vaccinations from experts from all over the world – not that science is based on consensus of course.

Looking at the the Barrington declaration for example we can see that a massive number of infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists reject the mainstream narrative and propaganda, and state unequivocally their grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies.

As of January 18th 2021, 53,589 medical practitioners, infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists, and 727,140 concerned citizens have signed the declaration asking for an end to the draconian Covid policies and demanding instead an approach described as ‘Focused Protection’. Detractors will predictably try to deny the validity of this important declaration and many like it such as the work of the World Doctors Alliance – inanely labelling anything that doesn’t suit their narrative as ‘science denying’ or ‘right wing’, and using a few individual pranksters who sign such things under silly made-up names, as an excuse to discredit the mass of expertise otherwise involved.

Elsewhere those trying to engage in discussion and debate on this crucial matter are attacked and ‘fact checked’ – also known as ‘being deemed inappropriate’ by propagandists often linked to the mainstream media and ‘the state’. Increasingly these fact checking sites themselves are seen as untrustworthy and pushing what many feel are disingenuous narratives, red herrings and spin.

It’s also worth noting that no results from any independent trial of the Covid drug are believed to have yet been published in a peer reviewed journal. This, if true, is also deeply unscientific to say the least.


Governmental, Big pharma and Big Tech conflict of interest

There’s also massive concern about those alleged to be unduly influencing UK policy in regards to the Covid 19 response, in particular SAGE, GAVI, CEPI, Imperial College London and others. As reported by renowned reporter and journalist Vanessa Beeley, UK Column and many others, Chris Whitty, the current UK Government’s Chief Medical Advisor and senior advisor in SAGE, was working as a Director and Principal Investigator at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine when they received Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funding of $40m in 2008, for malaria research in Africa.

Beeley also reports that Whitty was also involved in the kick-start of CEPI, Gates’ immunisation monopoly project, something she notes might not come as a huge surprise to many. Chris Whitty was also on the interim board of CEPI until the permanent board was announced in 2018. Whitty then went on to become UK Government’s Chief Medical Advisor. Shouldn’t we then be very concerned  that the UK Government has invested £50 million in CEPI while being advised by Whitty?

Not only was Chris Whitty’s School of Hygiene previously sponsored by the unelected Bill Gates and his foundation – Whitty was on the interim board of CEPI; he now chairs the UK Vaccine Network (UK VN). The UK VN brings together “industry, academia and relevant funding bodies to make targeted investments in specific vaccines and vaccine technology for infectious diseases with the potential to cause an epidemic”.

The UK Vaccine Network provides funding for vaccine development programmes. Projects supported by the UK’s Department of Health and Social Care through the UK Vaccine Network are listed online. Under Chris Whitty’s administration, Whitty himself is also co-lead for the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). According to Beeley again, the NIHR and UK Research and Innovation are reported to be giving another £20 million to CEPI for Covid–19 vaccine development. This is in addition to the £50 million already given by the UK Government to CEPI.

According to the Metro publication, current UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak, “..has also refused to confirm if he will profit from a spike in the share price of coronavirus vaccine manufacturer Moderna – one of the biggest investments held by the hedge fund he helped form before becoming an MP. The UK is alleged to have agreed to buy five million doses at an expected cost of between £24 ($32) and £28 ($37) per dose.”

Metro elaborates further that:  “Sunak helped found Theleme Partners, a major investor in Moderna. He left the firm in 2013, when he returned to the UK to pursue his political career. The firm was valued at $7billion when it was floated on the Nasdaq stock exchange in 2018, but is now valued at $39billion. It is not known whether the chancellor retained any investment in Theleme after leaving, which is registered in the tax heaven Cayman Islands and does not make company records public. In a list of ministers’ interests published last year, Sunak declared that he was the beneficiary of a blind trust – the contents of which have not been disclosed to the public”

It’s also worth mentioning that Rishi Sunak, worked as an analyst for the international investment bank giant Goldman Sachs between 2001 and 2004.

Matt Hancock is also yet another ‘public representative’ under increasing public scrutiny for his role, not to mention his unseemly Jokeresque behaviour in televsion interviews.

According to Vanessa Beeley again, as seen in these excellent research pieces here and here  which look at who allegedly controls or unduly influences the UK government in this matter, Public Health England “transferred its drug development to a new state-owned company, Porton Biopharma Ltd (PBL), which is wholly owned by Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for Health (currently Matt Hancock).

The Evening Standard is one of many to also report on Sir Patrick Vallance, who leads the Government’s expert advisory panel on vaccines, and who reportedly holds shares worth £600,000 in pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) – a drug company contracted to develop a coronavirus vaccine for the Government.

According to the Standard, the UK has had access to six different Covid-19 vaccine candidates in development, with orders allegedly placed in July “for 60 million doses from GSK and Sanofi Pasteur, subject to final contract”

There seems to be the possibility of significant conflict of interest going on here – anyone with a vaguely functioning brain should be able comprehend this. Sadly this seems to be a worrying trend if not the norm; the revolving door between government agencies and private, for-profit sectors. ‘Public private partnerships’ is the latest tedious and pervasive political mantra of the globalists and the rotting political establishment, with a special focus currently on vaccines.

It’s also bizarre and somewhat perversely amusing to see many of those largely self identifying as progressives and cosmopolitan liberals who, on the one hand, spend a great deal of their time shouting about the ‘evil Tory scum’ in London. Yet these same people blindly and slavishly follow every diktat and instruction thrusted at them by the very same Tories when it comes to lockdowns and the mass vaccination programmes – diktats and instructions that, in my view, essentially enslave them and take away their basic human rights and liberties. Talk about cognitive dissonance.

There will likely be attempts at further cruel trickery by the corporate globalists too – they may release a genuinely dangerous mass virus and blame this on all those claimed ‘evil protestors’ who are rightly trying to engage in rational and open discussion and to stop this anti human, evil agenda from taking away all our human rights, our humanity and our freedoms.

And as they have done already, the corporate globalist pushers will attempt to use the people themselves to do the globalists bidding for them, and to pit the people against each other to create division, hate and a culture of blame and distrust.

Cruelly, the inherent goodwill and empathy for others that most people have is being weaponised as a weapon against themselves and to enslave themselves and others. And the aim, as we already see, is to try to silence, shame and emotionally blackmail ‘dissenting’ or questioning voices who are speaking out for humanity. They are othered, demonised and called the usual inane names by the authorities and the mass media – conspiracy theorists, kooks, anti-vaxxers, far right etc. – all so very predictable and tiresome, but of more concern – a further damaging psychological attack on our humanity.

We need to be very vigilant of the true and evil powers at play here. Many are, perhaps understandably from a normal human point of view, simply unable to comprehend the magnitude of the evil at play.

Anyone who’s aware of plans such as the unelected World Economic Forum’s ‘Great reset’ to attempt to create an ‘interdependent’ global digital grid as an apparent response to the Covid 19 hysteria for example, will know what’s at stake here.  Or of reports like those predicting the possibility of global scenarios such as the current Covid 19 pandemic written as far back as 2010. And if you aren’t aware of such things, you have a duty to yourself and – more importantly perhaps, to others – to research them, understand what is happening and react accordingly, whatever your political affiliations or leanings.

As the famous quote often attributed to Thomas Jefferson goes, “Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty”.

Main article picture by Elliot Alderson

Leave a reply / Gadewch neges: