5G network is being switched on in Cardiff this Thursday, May 30th, with no independent research in to its effects on health and the environment
Five other cities all over Britain and northern Ireland will join Cardiff which includes Edinburgh, Birmingham, Manchester, Belfast and London, with a further roll out of 5G happening in the rest of Britain and northern Ireland from this year onwards, unless stopped.
Over 240 scientists from more than 40 countries have expressed “serious concerns”, via EMF Scientists Appeal, regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices.
Brussels and Geneva have already banned 5G because of safety concerns. Why are no elected politicians in Cardiff or Wales asking any questions about this?
Now you can ask these politicians to look in to the serious concerns about 5G’s effect on health and the environment on your behalf. A new template that you can send to your local representative has been created by a group named Parents and Concerned Citizens Against 5G. Protocol dictates that MP’s etc can only respond to their own constituents’ issues.
Simply click on the list below to find your MP.
Parliament website list of MPs:
Or to find your Welsh Parliament member or local councillor click on the below link:
When you see their details, copy and paste their email address, then copy and paste the template below (and adapt it as you see fit of course), and send it to the representative/s of your choice. A suggested subject heading could be ‘Potential serious risks of 5G’. Put your name at the bottom, as well as your address and/or postcode to confirm that you are their constituent. Then send.
Email Template to Send to Your MP/AM/Councillor:
Dear (name of MP)
An 18 page letter has been sent to every British MP, including you, by Parents and Concerned Citizens Against 5G. The letter outlines the very serious risks associated with the implementation of 5G technology, risks that are being kept well hidden from the public. A pdf copy of the letter is available here:
What many people don’t know is that 5G radio frequencies (RF), which will incorporate exponentially higher and more intense frequencies than 4G, are TOTALLY UNTESTED FOR SAFETY. What many people also don’t know is that over 200 highly qualified scientists and doctors have appealed to the EU warning of the ‘potential serious health effects’ of 5G and requesting a moratorium (halt) on the 5G roll out so that crucial safety testing can be carried out before people are exposed to its frequencies. The appeal states: ‘RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment’. The appeal is being disregarded.
5G antennae are primed to be deployed across the streets and roads of Britain within yards of our homes, schools and places of work. It is imperative Parliament takes action to stop this deployment until independent research into the potential dangers has been comprehensively undertaken. At this point, the government must become accountable to the facts relating to the known risks of mobile phone non-ionizing RF radiation, rather than defaulting to the shamefully misrepresentative ICNIRP guidelines it is currently… and conveniently… using to justify the rolling out of potentially hazardous 5G antennae. Continuing to deny the well documented risks and to reference the seriously flawed ICNIRP guidelines represents an erroneous and risk laden perspective that the government must cease from acting upon.
I refer you to the following appeal: October 2018, ‘The EMF Call’
(https://www.emfcall.org/the-emf-call/), which reads: ‘Scientists and NGOs Call for Truly Protective Limits for Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz)’ ‘ICNIRP’s opinion and guidelines are unscientific and protect industry, not public health… In order to protect the public and the environment from the known harmful effects from electromagnetic fields (EMF) we ask the United Nations, the World Health Organization and all governments not to accept the ICNIRP guidelines. They are not protective, rather they pose a serious risk to human health and the environment since they allow harmful exposure to the world population, including the most vulnerable, under the unscientific pretext that they are “protective”.’
I await your prompt reply.
(…your name and address)
For an informative/concerning video on the subject (one of many), please see below: