The sham of ‘Sustainable Development’ is what’s really behind the unhinged plan by elite academics from England to try and claim 10,000 hectares of Welsh land and 28,000 hectares of Welsh sea

By Gruffydd Meredith

Rebecca Wrigley, chief executive of Rewilding Britain recently explained how she and her charity believe they have a right to come in to Wales and claim 10,000 hectares of Welsh land and 28,000 hectares of Welsh sea.

It’s thought that this huge chunk of mid Wales that the charity Rewilding Britain are trying to claim for the plan is the largest area of its kind in the world in terms of population

Rewiliding, also called ‘Wildlands project’ is believed to be part of Agenda 21 and now Agenda 30 + Agenda 50, also known as ‘Sustainable Development’. This is an international agreement created and instigated by the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), also known as the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit, the Rio Summit, the Rio Conference or the Earth Summit, which was held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.

It’s a global agreement made without any democratic parliamentarian process by the countries involved, and involves Wales even though Wales had no say in the matter as the agreement was made before Wales had its own devolved Welsh Government and Parliamentary democracy.

Rosa Koire, an American woman famous for her research on the subject and for her book ‘Behind the green mask’ describes the whole Sustainable Development thus:

UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan implemented worldwide to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world. INVENTORY AND CONTROL.

Rosa goes on to describe how the plan, internationally, is to round people off the land and in to human habitation zones – in to ‘Smart cities’ that use the latest digital automation and surveillance technologies such as the 5G technology that Cardiff is now aiming to roll out, even though nobody knows what its effects on human health and the natural world are.

One of Rosa’s associated websites, The Post Sustainabilty Institute website goes on to describe what the ‘Sustainable development’ plan really is about:

In a nutshell, the plan calls for governments to take control of all land use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of private property owners.  It is assumed that people are not good stewards of their land and the government will do a better job if they are in control.  Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of communities as determined by the governing body.  Moreover, people should be rounded up off the land and packed into human settlements, or islands of human habitation, close to employment centers and transportation.  Another program, called the Wildlands Project spells out how most of the land is to be set aside for non-humans.

The plan has also been described more bluntly as an extremist globalist cult, with the cult members’ bibles being Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030.

Most people support conservation and environmentalism and the discussion about the sensible balance between Welsh farming and Welsh conservation is a matter for Welsh citizens including the farmers to have. But an increasing number of people believe that the real motives of rewilding and its corporate driven green agenda are very different to what people previously thought, and that this is ultimately about control and totalitarianism, not about protecting the environment.

Globalists are believed to be using well meaning people and environmentalists, as most of us in Wales and elsewhere are, as dupes and a means to an end to attack the sovereignty of indivdual countries.

The belief is that these globalists and their international corporate/governmental bodies will increase their exploitation and control of natural resources whilst destroying the environment – and whilst preaching to us plebs to be more green, to give up more of our rights and to pay more ‘carbon taxes’ to them.

And according to a great deal of independent observers and experts, the IPCC, the International Panel on Climate Change, has been rumbled for some years as a transnational political body, not a scientific one. They are believed by many to be making climate science work around their pre planned narrative rather than let empirical science speak for itself as real science requires. There have also been numerous scandals and exposés about them and how they operate which have underminded their credibility as a genuine evidence led scientific body.

At the moment, perhaps naïvely, the Welsh Government seem to be going along with the plan to give away huge tracts of Welsh land, offering their name as one of the partners in the project. But the plan is still only a wild eyed plan by strangers to the land. It mostly relies on Welsh farmers going along with it and selling their land to the hipster academics to create their giant fantasy wilderness park. It’s therefore essentially the farmers who can also stop it.

And the question remains, if these academics and those behind them like the idea of rewilding so much why don’t they do it in their own country and try to rewild Chelsea, Oxfordshire or the South East of England?